User talk:Charles Matthews

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Seale baronets

added a link pointing to County of Devon

Shakerley baronets

added a link pointing to KCB

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Additiona information over foreing Commerce and Navigation" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Additiona information over foreing Commerce and Navigation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 27 § Additiona information over foreing Commerce and Navigation until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 03:23, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Harwood

The article Philip Harwood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikociewie (talk) 23:57, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikociewie: Philip Harwood easily passes the usual tests for notability. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Wilton

The article Richard Wilton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

May as well be entirely imaginary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

T.H.G. Newton

Hi! I see you are making a lot of additions to the entry for my great-grandfather Goodwin (his son Mark was my grandfather). I just wondered what is your interest in the family, and whether you might be a distant relation of mine? [[User:Molly Romanov|Molly Romanov]] (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Molly Romanov: Hello. No personal family connection. I actually arrived at Horace Newton because of a connection with the Storrs family there; and that came out of the PROD nomination you can see above which had me checking on the Wilton family. Just a Sunday morning diversion (from Draft:Brewin Grant, which I should finish). On the Goodwin Newton article, some serious cleanup was needed, and I have an approach that says that fact-checking an article is best done by expanding it.

Generally speaking I'm positive about family history here, but it does need to be done to standard and kept under control. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, many thanks for your work! [[User:Molly Romanov|Molly Romanov]] (talk) 07:37, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Wilton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Wilton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Wilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]