Jump to content

Talk:Newt Gingrich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleNewt Gingrich was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 15, 2011Good article nomineeListed
March 6, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 21, 2011, January 21, 2014, January 21, 2017, and January 21, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article


"Dick Gephardt succeeded Newt Gingrich as Speaker"

[edit]

That should be Dennis Hastert's pic there, not Dick Gephardt's. 2605:A000:1316:6027:0:22A0:65EE:35D2 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

I changed his portrait back to something during his peak political years. He is technically still doing political things but hasn't held anything major since 1999; in similar ways Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Condoleezza Rice, etc. still have their old portraits despite still being alive and doing minor political stuff. 2A02:C7C:2DCE:1F00:B1F4:5E9B:8F57:D0A3 (talk) 14:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No significant edits to address concerns, and no one has indicated that they will be working on this article. Z1720 (talk) 14:14, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted in 2011. This article needs a lot of copyediting for concision and evaluation of due weight. Several unreliable sources are used, mainly OurCampaigns. I would not pass this at GA in its current state. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.